My name is Alden Park. I appreciate people saying their names so that I can better learn their names. I am the Fresno 5th Ward History Specialist. I plan to submit this testimony as a story for our Fresno Fifth Ward history. You are welcome to submit stories to me or to your organization leaders (especially including secretaries) for inclusion in our ward history as records of our stewardships. After the stories are published you may sign in at churchofjesuschrist.org, to read the ward stories for at least two years.

As I had faith in my youth, I was shown miracles by God. With God’s help, He showed me in 1968 the truth about gravity and the wheel, long prior to my joining the Church, but I didn’t fully understand what I was shown for 40 years. I began to understand, when I asked God a scientific prayer question in 2000 and I was immediately shown a vision. It still took me eight more years for me to understand what I was shown but I understood in about 2008 or 40 years after I was shown by God the answer as a December-born 14-year-old boy, during the McKinley low-friction-demonstration, during the spring of 1968. Every wheel rotating about a horizontal axis receives extra rotational kinetic energy from gravity. God was extremely patient with me, knowing more about me than I knew about myself.

During this January to February 2026, I gained some insight into what was meant by Genesis 1:3-5 from other things that I was shown by God. During the first day, God divided the light from the darkness by allowing good light coming from eternal light-emitting spirit matter to be specially absorbed by the good light coming from other eternal light-emitting spirit matter. By this the temporarily appearing spirit matter in the absorbing light did not disappear but remained forever. The new spirit matter remained to become eternal spirit matter eternally or forever afterward continually emitting light or rather Day when previously being Night or darkness not sending forth light. The new spirit matter came along with its own new space. With enough new spirit matter, the spirit matter later could condense into matter in obedience to God but not into anti-matter. Turning the evening into the morning for the first day was the essential first step in God’s creation process. This was the essential most-ancient-origin of all the matter for this earth.

All things bear continual testimony of Jesus Christ. Gravity as a powerful symbol of Jesus Christ is formed in a highly unusual birth from the two discrete light fields coming from oppositely-charged spirit matter. The gravity travels in a perfectly straight line through its lifetime until it dies an intelligent self-sacrificial death of both its parts. The process can produce attraction of matter coming more unto it or new rotational kinetic energy as matter turns more unto it or when absorbed by light, new eternal spirit matter, forever producing new light.

We live in an infinite, energy-increasing, matter-increasing, and expanding universe, which was always infinite, energy-increasing, matter-increasing, and expanding. Such a universe requires God. By God’s continual manifestation of myriads of symbolic testimonies of Jesus Christ, vast quantities of new eternal spirit matter continually come forth with their own new space. As produced by God, new worlds without number have been and will be coming forth. In obedience to God, sufficient collections of new spirit matter condense into hydrogen and not into anti-hydrogen. By turning to Jesus Christ, we can resolve many questions, which some scientists struggle to answer. With help from God, we would easily know where the so-called dark-matter comes from and what the so-called dark-energy really is. We would easily know why the universe is almost exclusively matter with very little anti-matter. We would know that there was no Big Bang, though the world preaches the lie to us. The world preaches a lie to us that the sun gets its energy deep down inside the sun by nuclear reactions but that is obviously wrong, since the temperatures on the sun actually increase as there is more exposure to the ultra-cold background temperature of space. Our sun could produce energetic light forever, if that is what God desires. Some scientists should not be so quick to say that there is a supermassive black hole in the middle of a galaxy, after reading the Book of Abraham and after having knowledge that much gravity and light at the centers of galaxies produces much new dark-obscuring-matter there.

The world delays doing various scientific experiments, such as rotating cylinders about horizontal axes out in ultra-low-friction space. The world often doesn’t put the Book of Mormon to a proper scientific test. See Moroni 10:3-5. The answer by the power of the Holy Ghost, with direct spirit to spirit communication, is not limited by crude external measurements. There is a provability of the existence of God. I hope that this testimony has increased your faith in God. I leave this small portion of my testimony concerning the Lord in the name of our Lord and Savior, Jesus the Christ. Amen.

My new book, Many Scientific Enigmas Have New Solutions (MSEHNS), was made available for viewing and downloading for free on 3 June 2025 at https://gravityunveiled.home.blog in pdf form (or viewed and saved at https://gravity-wheel.neocities.org). It speaks of the coming rotational energy revolution. Many new 24-7 green energy productive devices will be coming forth. When there were suppressed/unknown physical principles for a long time, that meant that there were many scientific enigmas/puzzles/riddles for a long time. When the physical principles would eventually come to light, then those many (at least 89) scientific enigmas would have their proper new solutions/explanations (based upon the new principles) come to light. See MSEHNS for the new principles, solutions, and devices. Those 89 solutions are strong evidence for the Bessler principle and applicability to many other enigmas. It is simpler to explain many enigmas using reasonable principles, than to leave the many enigmas unexplained. The front and back covers of MSEHNS may suggest some ideas associated with my new book. – 20250605AEP

The front cover is above.

The back cover is above.

There is a fundamental physical principle (the Bessler principle) that has been ignored by the scientific establishment for at least 300 years. The principle accounts for many phenomena such as how the sun actually obtains its energy. See my free 2019 book Gravity-Wheel Unveiled for many more examples.

Sun’s Energy Source. Since circa 1945 it has been widely touted that the sun gets its radiant energy from hot fusion (nuclear reactions deep down within the sun). If that were actually true, then the temperatures associated with the sun would decrease where there is greater exposure to the very-cold three-degrees-Kelvin background-temperature-of-space. But according to measurements, the temperatures actually increase as those temperatures are measured further from the sun’s center. The sun temperatures increase from the deeper-darker-cooler sunspots to the 6000 degrees-Kelvin photosphere to the furthest edges of the solar atmosphere/corona (10,000,000 degrees Kelvin). Sun temperatures are exactly contrary to a hot fusion explanation for the sun’s energy source. The measured temperatures perfectly fit a Bessler principle explanation. See section 4.4 “Sun Power” of my book, Gravity-Wheel Unveiled. See near section “Solar Corona Explained” within section 5.1 “Atmospheric or Orbital Phenomena”. See section “Coronal Heating Problem” within section 15.6 “Solutions to Prior Unsolved Problems”. See section “Sunspots” within section 8.2 “Phenomena Dependent upon Bessler Principle”.

Truth? Since circa 1945 and even for the last 300 years there has been a great scientific cover up. Falsehoods are being touted at the expense of the suppressed truth. Do we value truth so little that we allow so-called “science” to declare its own versions of truth, without regard to experiment and observations? Should there be a double standard for the truth? Should great intellectual biases/prejudices allow double standards of the truth?

More Examples. For more examples of “scientific” unfairness with respect to the truth, see my Internet sites, gravityunveiled.home.blog and gravity-wheel.neocities.org, which show how to get my free pdf book Gravity-Wheel Unveiled (of 2019 March 18). The sites also point to my chiastic poem “The Long-Ignored Bessler Principle: A Chiasm for Overlooked Rotational-Energy Sources” (of 2020 April 25). The poem (gravity-wheel.neocities.org/BesslerPrinciplePoem.txt) tries to summarize some of my most important points regarding the suppressed Bessler principle. – Alden Park

Partial Solutions to Problems. There are partial solutions to many perplexing problems, which solutions neither need government intervention nor mandates, if the truth is allowed to go forth. Such problems include: global warming, food shortages, loss of pure water sources, scarcity of resources, pollution, high-cost of materials, high-cost of energy, and desertification. Having vast new sources of inexpensive-nonpolluting energy would automatically solve many problems. There are new inexpensive “green” solutions that do not depend on currently expensive “green” solutions such as solar and wind. Many Bessler principle experiments need to be done and many observations need to be considered. So far, due to great intellectual bias/prejudice, neither the many Bessler principle experiments are being done nor the many Bessler principle observations are being generally considered.

Solution Routes. There are short-term development costs associated with following the Bessler principle routes to partial solutions. If we completely ignore the routes, then we will never understand the benefits of taking such routes. Some possible routes to very-low-cost energy solutions could include using: Orffyrean roller bearings, Sweet Sixteen family of cylinders, Papp engines, and GEET reactors. The long-term fuel costs will be extremely low because the Bessler principle processes consume no fuels, just as the sun consumes no fuel when it obtains energy from the Bessler principle. Many scientists need to consider the experiments and observations associated with the Bessler principle. If the experiments are not done, if the observations are not made, and if the devices are not built, then the idea of a Bessler principle will continue to be largely ignored, to the detriment of solutions to many perplexing problems. The solutions are greatly needed for the benefit of our world. 20200704AEP

Having a supermassive body that appears black does not prove that it is a supermassive black hole. Any evidence that there is a black body around a supermassive center of a galaxy doesn’t prove that there is a supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy. Since there is much light and much gravity near the center of a galaxy, I think that means that there is much formation of new finest-fundamental particles there, which later are combined to form much new obscuring hydrogen atoms. See related discussions within my free 2019 book, Gravity-Wheel Unveiled, such as in section 11.2 “Cosmology” within paragraphs “New Matter/Space?”, “Quasars”, “Black Holes?”, and “Galaxies”. The most central stars in galaxies might well be huge, massive stars surrounded by very large amounts of obscuring matter, causing them to appear dark. Also see discussions in my book within section C.2 “Kolob’s Location Discussion” including paragraphs “Kolob Greatest Light” and “Kolob’s Location Discussion Summary”.

Slight Similarity to Black Night Sky. The situation is slightly similar to the situation in the black night sky. The background of space appears to be black from all the new obscuring matter out there coming from gravity pulling down on light, followed by condensing of the finest fundamental particles. We shouldn’t immediately jump to a conclusion that because the night sky is black there are black holes out there in every direction.

Don’t Jump to Unsupported Conclusions. People who are ignorant of the Bessler principle should not jump to such conclusions as that quasars must contain black holes. We shouldn’t jump to conclusions that there are event horizons surrounding supermassive black bodies. It seems funny to me that many people immediately leap to conclusions that black supermassive bodies must contain supermassive black holes. They should only say that there are black supermassive bodies. Based on much evidence that there actually is a partial shielding/shadowing of gravity as it passes through matter, by assuming black-hole-friendly theory in which “gravity” is a manifestation of the contiguous geometry of spacetime, then that would suggest either that there can be transient disturbances of the contiguous geometry of spacetime traveling at the speed of light or that there can be disrupted contiguous geometry of spacetime traveling at speeds greater than the speed of light. For example, as a small body rotates around another body having large gravity shielding, then the gravitational-shadows would provide motion of geometrical disruptions of contiguous spacetime traveling in spirals at speeds greater than the speed of light. Such motion of the disrupted contiguous geometry of spacetime traveling at such rapid speeds would not seem reasonable according to conventional black-hole-friendly gravitational theory coming from Einstein. Based on evidence, Einstein himself apparently saw the coming of problems with his theory, which could not be corrected, unless he changed his contiguous-structures theory to a theory explicitly based upon discrete gravitational entities traveling at the speed of light. In 1954, Einstein was prepared to give up his theory of gravity, when suggestive evidence appeared that there could be a partial shielding/shadowing of gravity, when gravity passes through matter. See my book, Gravity-Wheel Unveiled, such as in section 1.3 “Consequences of Gravity Absorption” in and near paragraph “Einstein’s Comment to Besso”.

Much Evidence of Gravity Being Shielded. I think that the preponderance of evidence is currently on the side of gravity being partly shielded as it passes through matter. See Gravity-Wheel Unveiled for much evidence of that. The preponderance of evidence comes down on the side of gravity being a discrete phenomenon rather than a phenomenon based on contiguous structures. My book shows how a discrete theory of gravity could suggest there is a Bessler principle. There is much evidence for an energy-nonconservative Bessler principle as discussed in my book. There wouldn’t be a Bessler principle, if it were not for each graviton having two separate absorptions. These separate absorptions provide much evidence that gravity is shielded. Also, gravity doesn’t just get weaker and weaker continuously (to infinitesimal amounts of precision) as it goes out from its source. Rather gravity consists of discrete entities traveling at the speed of unobstructed light, with there being locally fewer of the entities traveling outward from a source of gravity, as we go outward. That is a reasonably better way of thinking about the situation. How can we possibly think that there is a perfectly contiguous spacetime structure in this discrete universe? Everything around us speaks of discreteness. How could discrete matter contiguously alter contiguous spacetime structure as gravity is absorbed? How could the conveyers of a force not be absorbed, when conveying the force? The manifold evidences for the Bessler principle are not the only evidences that gravity is a discrete entity.

More Evidence of Gravity Being Shielded. The two pull-downs from each graviton being attractively absorbed provide a simple explanation of how energetic cosmic rays acquire greater kinetic energy. Rapidly-moving cosmic-ray-particles simply attractively absorb more gravitons in front of them than in their rear. See my book, Gravity-Wheel Unveiled, for discussions related to cosmic rays (mainly found in Chapter 10 “COSMIC RAYS EXPLAINED”, but also see section 6.3 “Translations and Rotations”). — That there is a Bessler principle provides a great amount of evidence that there are two attractive pull-downs as each graviton is absorbed. That there are two attractive pull-downs, as gravity pulls down on light, provides a simple explanation for pairs of finest fundamental new matter coming into being far out in space, where there is light and energetic gravity. The two attractively absorbed portions of the energetic graviton allow two finest-fundamental particles to remain behind as the graviton is “destroyed” by being absorbed. Large collections of many such finest-fundamental particles could later condense into obscuring hydrogen atoms. If that is the correct analysis far out in “empty” space, wouldn’t much denser collections of new obscuring matter be formed near the middle of galaxies where there are much greater intensities of light and much more available concentrations of gravity? See my discussions within my book, Gravity-Wheel Unveiled, related to new or dark matter (mainly found in section 11.1 “Cosmos Unconstrained by Energy Conservation” but also see sub-section “Dark Matter” within the section 15.6 “Solutions to Prior Unsolved Problems”).

Faulty Proofs for Black Holes. Just because a massive star has greater than three solar masses does not prove that it is a black hole, when that criteria is based upon flawed theory. Just because a massive star has an accretion disc (emitting x-rays) does not prove that it contains a black hole, especially when it can be accounted for by a more reasonable theory. Just because a massive star has polar jets perpendicular to the accretion disc does not prove that it is a black hole, especially when it can be accounted for by a more reasonable theory. Should we have greater confidence in Einstein’s theory of gravity (which Einstein himself was not confident in) than a reasonable discrete theory of gravity, which reasonable theory predicts the quite testable and observable Bessler principle? See Gravity-Wheel Unveiled section 15.6 “Solutions to Prior Unsolved Problems” subsection “Origin of Accretion Disc Jets” and section 11.2 “Cosmology” paragraph “Quasars”. Also see section C.4 “Location of Outer Darkness Discussion” including paragraphs “Cast into Outer Darkness Commentary One”, “Nature of Black Holes”, and “Automatic Prevention of Black Holes Forming?” 20200618AEP

Click here to go to the top of my home page for my site gravityunveiled.home.blog where you can download a free pdf copy of my 18 March 2019 book, Gravity-Wheel Unveiled. You may also want to download my other free pdf books, while you are there.

Here are eleven paragraph headings for this discussion: Overlooked Bessler Principle Solutions, Sun’s Energy Not from Hot Fusion, Bessler Principle, Some Bessler Principle Devices, Protect Environment, Remediate Radioactive Nuclear Materials, Proper Education, Bessler Principle Hiding/Cover-up, Why Little Discussion on Gravity Powered Engines?, Slowly Switch to Pure Bessler Principle Devices, and Slowly Switch from Fossil Fuels to Pure Bessler Principle Devices.

Overlooked Bessler Principle Solutions. Some climate change activists might be ignoring “green” solutions coming from the beneficial Bessler principle. The Bessler principle is an often overlooked means for reducing/eliminating carbon dioxide being put out into the atmosphere, while producing energy. If we “purely” use the Bessler principle, assuming we redevelop certain devices (Orffyrean roller bearings, Sweet Sixteen family of cylinders, and Papp engines), then we will be able to produce as much energy as we need at a very low cost. We will produce that energy without dumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. As we do so, we will not need to resort to energy coming from higher cost windmills, solar collectors, geothermal reservoirs, hydroelectric dams, and nuclear reactors. I say those things come at a higher cost, since they come along with extra baggage including: extra environmental costs, extra resource costs, and extra decommissioning costs. It is in a way surprising that the Bessler principle has been overlooked, since the method is the greatest energy producer in this solar system. The sun produces its energy using the Bessler principle rather than using hot fusion. 20200227AEP

Sun’s Energy Not from Hot Fusion. If the sun obtained its energy by nuclear reactions deep down within the sun, then the portions closest to the nuclear reactions would have the highest temperatures and the portions of the sun that are the furthest away (most exposed to the 3 degrees Kelvin background temperature of space or cold enough to liquefy helium) would be the coldest. In actual practice the exact opposite temperatures are observed on the sun. The sunspots are holes in the photosphere. They are deeper than the 6000 degrees Kelvin photosphere. The sunspots are always darker and colder than the photosphere. Also, the far portions of the solar atmosphere give off some radiations that are 1,000,000 degrees Kelvin or even 10,000,000 degrees Kelvin at the furthest edges of the solar atmosphere (where there are the fewest interactions between nuclei/atoms). The sun actually gets its energy from the Bessler principle, which we need to better use on the earth for the benefit of our finances and our environment. We have in the past ignorantly used the Bessler principle as part of our energy production but better knowing of that principle allows us to better use it. 20200227AEP

Bessler Principle. The Bessler principle may be stated as, “Every wheel rotating about a horizontal axis acquires more energy from gravity.” The definition includes ultra-small wheels that are the size of individual nuclei. The effect can often be enhanced, when rotational friction is greatly reduced and angular speed is larger. For macroscopic wheels of very large angular speed there is typically a permanently reduced communication/transfer/sharing of energy between the lattice of the wheel and the rotating nuclear-ground-states within. The reactions of the plentiful and energetic two-part gravitons with matter provide the free “fuel” for the Bessler principle. There is usually a slight time delay between the lower elevation downward pull of the two-part graviton and the later higher-elevation downward-pull of the rest of the graviton. Because there is a time delay, allowing the higher elevation mass point to move/rotate between the downward pulls, this tends to cause a torque to increase the angular speed of the two mass points about their center. With much typical rotational friction, the acquired rotational kinetic energy is typically lost to the friction, making the acquired extra energy often not useful for doing work. For special cases of extremely little rotational friction, the acquired rotational kinetic energy can be greater than that lost to friction, making the acquired extra energy immediately available for doing work. 20200227AEP

Some Bessler Principle Devices. The Bessler principle can be invoked using a number of devices. See my Internet sites https://gravity-wheel.neocities.org/ and https://gravityunveiled.home.blog/, where at the second site one can get pdf versions of my books for free. Those three free books (each of 18 March 2019) are: Gravity-Wheel Unveiled, Bessler’s Little Book Decoded, and A Book in Every Home Decoded. The books and sites explain how various devices obtain energy using the Bessler principle. Here are some “new” devices that can produce energy using the Bessler principle: wheels using Bessler’s ultra-low friction roller bearings, Leedskalnin’s Sweet Sixteen family of cylinders, Papp’s engines, Pantone’s GEET reactors, and Muammer Yildiz’s magnetic motor. The last two are currently working devices that have been patented. I am especially recommending the first three devices, which I believe were built in times past. These devices may be very difficult to build in some cases, because they somehow must embody extremely-low rotational-friction. Bessler did it with wonderfully-low-friction great-mechanical-supporting roller-bearings, which were always rolling without any sliding. The largest lobes on internal surfaces of his bearings rolled through 25 degrees, while maintaining rolling contact with its corresponding lobe hole. We have nothing like that today, since it can’t be machined, though it can be grown. Leedskalnin’s device used magnetically-repulsive sprocket-wheels to transfer energy between adjacent cylinders, without any touching friction. His smallest (or daughter) cylinder had the lowest air friction and was rotating 24/16 = 1.5 times faster than his mother or father cylinder, but not so rapidly to destroy the rotational energy connection between the daughter cylinder and the rotating nuclear-ground-states within it. Papp left out important information in his patents, which information I tried to supply in my main book, Gravity-Wheel Unveiled. Those three devices exploited separate physical regimes associated with the Bessler principle. We need to begin a multi-trillion-dollar energy-production industry centered upon such nearly pure Bessler principle devices. If desired, I can offer free help with respect to what needs to be done to promote such new technology. 20200227AEP

Protect Environment. To produce energy, we do not need to burn precious fossil fuels, while releasing carbon dioxide to the environment. We can produce as much energy as we need by directly using the Bessler principle, with no energy-fuel costs, while not releasing any polluting carbon dioxide into the environment. We must roll up our sleeves and make these things happen. If the sea levels rise due to global warming, we can be purifying much water and pumping it inland to where it is needed. We can also be pumping water inland to ancient dried up seas in Asia, assuming the people there find that to be a desirable thing. With an increase in agriculture/forests/jungles, much carbon dioxide will be removed from the atmosphere. That carbon dioxide removal, along with not putting extra carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, should bring the carbon dioxide down to “normal” levels, which should decrease global warming. 20200227AEP

Remediate Radioactive Nuclear Materials. While we are protecting the environment using the Bessler principle, we might also use it to also remediate long-half-life radioactive materials. We can do this by rapid enough rotations about horizontal axes. We can remediate long-half-life radioactive materials by rotations about other axes but we might as well allow the Bessler principle to do much of the work for us. The decay rate of a nucleus can be changed by rapidly rotating the nucleus about an axis so as to alter its configurations. Rotating a nucleus of many nucleons causes the nucleons to be somewhat thrown outward from its internal rotational axis. That process encourages any slightly unstable decay process to occur more rapidly. A rapid enough angular speed would rotationally rip apart a nucleus into its individual internally-rotating nucleons of protons and neutrons. A rapidly rotating neutron would rapidly decay into a proton and an electron (ignoring the antineutrino also produced). A normal neutron that is not rotating but is by itself would take a long time to decay (on the order of 15 minutes). A nucleus can be for example rotated rapidly, if it is embedded in the lattice of a rapidly rotating wheel, especially if the wheel is rapidly rotated about a horizontal axis, since the Bessler principle would cause the nucleus to rotate even more rapidly. GEET reactors can more easily cause nuclear-ground-states to very rapidly rotate about internal axes. Totally ripping apart nuclei would be a highly undesirable goal, as it would turn the atoms/nuclei into hydrogen/protons. It would be extremely difficult to return the hydrogen/protons to their original combined nuclear states. 20200227AEP

Proper Education. There should not be miseducation of people about ideas regarding energy production. We need to correctly teach about the Bessler principle and its many implications for very low-cost energy. Correctly using very low-cost energy production methods has all sorts of beneficial implications including: much lower energy costs for farming, greatly reduced costs for many foods, affordable water purified from the oceans, much lower typical transportation costs, much lower typical supply costs, much lower manufacturing costs, greatly reduced costs for many raw materials, affordable creation of local artificial environments, and new industries previously not energy affordable. See my books and Internet sites for details of why the Bessler principle works and for details of why/how various Bessler principle related devices/phenomena work. 20200227AEP

Bessler Principle Hiding/Cover-up. There has been a hiding or cover-up of the Bessler principle for at least three centuries. I think that the cover-up was unintentional. It was partly done out of ignorance of the Bessler principle. The principle also automatically provides much hiding of itself. If there is little angular speed and much rotational friction, then the principle is greatly hidden. Evidence for a more recent cover-up/hiding should be clear in the well propagated idea that the sun gets its energy from hot fusion, even though now we should see that the hot fusion idea runs completely counter to the measured temperatures from the sun with respect to elevation. Long ago, the scientists built up a false position under the name of conservation of energy. They had not yet learned that none of the forces are ever energy conservative. Many people still don’t know that because of the fiction propped up of there existing physical potential energy entities (which are only an approximate artifact due to later absorptions of discrete fields). Each absorption of a discrete electric field is without energy being conserved. Many people have not yet learned that each graviton is a special quantum pairing of discrete electric fields coming from finest fundamental opposite charges of equal masses (which may be called spirit matter). The absorptions, of each two-part discrete graviton, are never energy conservative. Because of belief in conservation of energy, the truth about the energy non-conservative Bessler principle was long resisted and is still resisted today. The truth will eventually come forth, despite how long it is covered up. Time will tell. 20200227AEP

Why Little Discussion on Gravity Powered Engines? Why is there so little discussion about the gravity-powered engines, when such gravity-powered energy production is the greatest source of new energy in this solar system? I think I know part of the answer why there is at least 300 years of covering up, which covering up continues even to today. (1) Bessler hid the workings of his roller bearing invention. (2) Scientists didn’t understand why Bessler’s horizontal-axle wheels produced the many power production results that they did. (3) Without explanations for Bessler’s “self” powering wheels, “history” in a greatly-biased fashion suppressed Bessler’s many results. (4) Bessler coded his ultra-low-friction rolling-bearing-invention in a book (published in 1717, though it was not decoded until this century). (5) People didn’t understand Leedskalnin’s results or rather how they were produced. (6) Leedskalnin coded his invention (and how to properly use it) in a book (published in 1936, though it was not decoded until this century). (7) Scientists incorrectly assumed in ignorance (due to apparent lack of options) the source of power/energy for the sun. (8) Scientists didn’t understand how Papp’s engine worked (in 1968). (9) The students at the 1968 McKinley low-friction-demonstration didn’t understand how the acceleration went from almost no wheel rotation to a steady “perpetual” rotation. (10) The Bessler principle comes along with its own self-hiding, as discussed above in the prior paragraph, “Bessler Principle Hiding/Cover-up”. This last reason may be the most important reason for why there is so little discussion about the gravity-powered engines obtaining extra rotational-kinetic-energy from energetic two-part gravitons. (11) Many people didn’t even realize how a nucleus could slightly rotate about an internal axis, through its center of mass, which could then allow the Bessler principle to work for greater rotations about internal horizontal axes, through each center of mass of each nucleus. 20200227AEP

Slowly Switch to Pure Bessler Principle Devices. Don’t immediately switch away from traditional “green” solutions in favor of more use of the Bessler principle solutions. Remember that wind power with huge heavy blades, using rotations about horizontal axes, partly uses the Bessler principle. It is possible to produce roller bearings with friction so low that the fans rotating about horizontal axes can rotate even when there is no wind. For example, think of Muammer Yildiz’s magnetic motor. Turbine blades may partially serve to reduce the turbine’s angular speed, which might otherwise greatly reduce the communication of rotational kinetic energy between the wheels and the rotating nuclear-ground-states within the wheels. If nuclear-ground-states rotate too rapidly, then by their great local heating they will destroy their local connection with the surrounding wheel. We need to work on or rethink some more precise methods for limiting angular speed. We don’t want a rapid wind to come along and cause a wind turbine to rotate too fast, to the detriment of future communication of rotational kinetic energy within that turbine. We can’t rely upon the blades alone to do the job of angular speed governing. 20200227AEP

Slowly Switch from Fossil Fuels to Pure Bessler Principle Devices. We should also not immediately switch away from fossil fuels to the destruction of our economies. Many things are interrelated between the fossil fuels and production of say synthetic materials, for example plastics. We might slowly introduce the “new” sources of power and allow the economies to somewhat gradually shift away from the burning of fossil fuels. Still, we must not take too long in the transition to the detriment of our environment. We should see a steady lowering of prices for fossil fuels, as the alternative methods of energy production are made available. 20200227AEP

Within my https://gravity-wheel.neocities.org/OtherSites.html I provided some 20191030 comments about the 1977 book, Perpetual Motion: The History of an Obsession, by Arthur W. J. G. Ord-Hume (which book is available at https://archive.org/details/PerpetualMotionTheHistoryOfAnObsession). Often, because the idea of conservation of energy, I think that Ord-Hume wrote against the idea of perpetual motion, since it would violate the idea of energy being conserved. I refuted some of Ord-Hume’s analyses. I made comments, about how the energy non-conservative Bessler-principle could make perpetual motion possible. Within my comments about Ord-Hume’s Chapter 4, I made comments defending Bessler’s wheels. Within my comments about Ord-Hume’s Chapter 15 “Perpetual Lamps”, I suggested potential ways that someone might try to construct perpetual lamps, using the Bessler principle. 20191101AEP